Culture
Culture
is
a modern concept based on a term first used in classical antiquity by the Roman
orator Cicero, culture animi. This non agricultural use of the term culture
re appeared in modern Europe in the 17th century referring to the betterment or
refinement of individuals, especially through education. During the 18th and
19th century it came to refer more frequently to the common reference points of
whole peoples, and discussion of the term was often connected to national
aspirations or ideals. Some scientists such as Edward Tylor used the term culture
to refer to a universal human capacity.
In
the 20th century, culture
emerged as a central concept in anthropology, encompassing the range of human
phenomena that cannot be directly attributed to genetic inheritance.
Specifically, the term culture in
American anthropology had two meanings,
The evolved human capacity to classify and
represent experiences with symbols, and to act imaginatively and creatively,
The distinct ways that people, who live differently,
classified and represented their experiences, and acted creatively
Hoebel
describes culture as an integrated system of learned behavior patterns which
are characteristic of the members of a society and which are not a result of
biological inheritance.
Distinctions
are currently made between the physical artifacts created by a society, its so called
material culture, and everything else, the intangibles such as language, customs,
etc. that are the main referent of the term culture.
Etymology
The
modern term culture is based on a term used by the Ancient Roman orator Cicero
in his Tusculan Disputations, where he wrote of a cultivation of the soul or cultura animi, using an agricultural
metaphor for the development of a philosophical soul, understood teleological as
the highest possible ideal for human development. took over this metaphor in a
modern context, meaning something similar, but no longer assuming that philosophy
was man's natural perfection. His use and that of many writers after him refers to all the ways in which human beings
overcome their original barbarism, and through artifice, become fully human.
The
term culture, which originally meant the cultivation of the soul or mind,
acquires most of its later modern meanings in the writings of the 18th
century German thinkers, who were on various levels developing Rousseau critic
of modern liberalisms and Enlightment. Thus a contrast between culture and civilization
is usually implied in these authors, even when not expressed as such. Two
primary meanings of culture emerge from this period: culture as the folk spirit
having a unique identity, and culture as cultivation of waywardness or free
individuality. The first meaning is predominant in our current use of the term culture,
although the second still plays a large role in what we think culture should
achieve, namely the full expression of the unique or authentic self.
Change
Cultural
invention has come to mean any innovation that is new and found to be useful to
a group of people and expressed in their behavior but which does not exist as a
physical object. Humanity is in a global accelerating culture change period,
driven by the expansion of international commerce, the mass media, and above
all, the human population explosion, among other factors.
Cultures
are internally affected by both forces encouraging change and forces resisting
change. These forces are related to both social structure and natural events,
and are involved in the perpetuation of cultural ideas and practices within
current structures, which themselves are subject to change.
Social
conflict and the development of technologies can produce changes within a
society by altering social dynamics and promoting new cultural modeals, and
spurring or enabling generative action. These social shifts may accompany
ideological shifts and other types of cultural change. For example, the U.S.
feminist movement involved new practices that produced a shift in gender
relations, altering both gender and economic structures. Environmental
conditions may also enter as factors. For example, after tropical forests
returned at the end of the last ice age, plants suitable for domestication were
available, leading to the invention of, which in turn brought about many
cultural innovations and shifts in social dynamics.
Cultures
are externally affected via contact between societies, which may also produce or
inhibit social shifts and changes in cultural practices. War or competition
over resources may impact technological development or social dynamics.
Additionally, cultural ideas may transfer from one society to another, through
diffusion or acculturation. In diffusion, the form of something moves from one
culture to another. For example, hamburgers, fast food in the United States,
seemed exotic when introduced into China. Stimulus diffusion refers to an
element of one culture leading to an invention or propagation in another. Direct
Borrowing on the other hand tends to refer to technological or tangible
diffusion from one culture to another. Diffusion of innovations theory presents
a research based model of why and when individuals and cultures adopt new
ideas, practices, and products.
Acculturation
has different meanings, but in this context refers to replacement of the traits
of one culture with those of another, such as what happened to certain Native
American tribes and to many indigenous peoples across the globe during the
process of colonization. Related processes on an individual level include
assimilation and transliteration.
Early
modern discourses
German Romanticism
The
German philosopher Immanuel Knet has formulated an individualist definition of enlightenment
similar to the concept of Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self incurred
immaturity. He argued that this immaturity comes not from a lack of
understanding, but from a lack of courage to think independently. Against this
intellectual cowardice, Kant urged, Sapere
aude, dare to be wise in reaction to Kant, German scholars such as argued
that human creativity, which necessarily takes unpredictable and highly diverse
forms, is as important as human rationality. Moreover, Herder proposed a
collective form of bildung For
Herder, Bildung was the totality of experiences that provide a coherent
identity, and sense of common destiny, to a people.
In
1795, the great linguist and philosopher Wilhelm von Humboldt 1767 to 1835 called
for anthropology that would synthesize Kant and herder interests. During the Romantic
era, scholors in Germany out of diverse principalities, and the nationalist struggles
by ethnic minorities against the Astro Hungarian Empire developed a more
inclusive notion of culture as worldview. According to this school of thought,
each ethnic group has a distinct worldview that is incommensurable with the
worldviews of other groups. Although more inclusive than earlier views, this
approach to culture still allowed for distinctions between civilized and primitive
or tribal cultures.
In
1860, Adolf Bastin argue for the psychic unity of mankind. He proposed that a
scientific comparison of all human societies would reveal that distinct
worldviews consisted of the same basic elements. According to Bastian, all human
societies share a set of elementary ideas different cultures, or different folk
ideas, are local modifications of the elementary ideas. This view paved the way
for the modern understanding of culture. Franz Boas was trained in this
tradition, and he brought it with him when he left Germany for the United
States.
English Romanticism
In the 19th century, humanists such as English poet
and essayist Matthew Arnold used the word culture to refer to an ideal of individual
human refinement, of the best that has been thought and said in the world. This
concept of culture is comparable to the German concept of bildung, culture being a pursuit of
our total perfection by means of getting to know, on all the matters which most
concern us, the best which has been thought and said in the world.
In practice, culture referred to an elite ideal and was associated with such
activities as art, classical music and haute cuisine. As these forms were
associated with urban life, culture was identified with civilization. Another
facet of the Romantic Movement was an interest in folklore high culture, which
led to identifying a culture among non elites. This distinction is often
characterized as that between high culture, namely that of the ruling social
group, and low culture. In other words, the idea of culture that developed in
Europe during the 18th and early 19th centuries reflected inequalities within
European societies.
Matthew Arnold contrasted culture with anarchy, other
Europeans, following philosophers Thomas Hobbes and Jean Jacques Rousseau, contrasted
culture with the state of nature. According to Hobbes and Rousseau, the Native
American who were being conquered by Europeans from the 16th centuries on were
living in a state of nature, this opposition was expressed through the contrast
between civilized and uncivilized. According to this way of thinking, one could
classify some countries and nations as more civilized than others and some
people as more cultured than others. This contrast led to Herbert spencer
theory of social Darwinism and lewis hentry morgan theory of cultural evolution.
Just as some critics have argued that the distinction between high and low
cultures is really an expression of the conflict between European elites and
non elites, some critics have argued that the distinction between civilized and
uncivilized people is really an expression of the conflict between European
colonial powers and their colonial subjects.
Other 19th century critics, following
Rousseau have accepted this differentiation between higher and lower culture,
but have seen the refinement and sophistication of high culture as corrupting
and unnatural developments that obscure and distort people essential nature.
These critics considered folk rock, folk metal, electric folk, and others.
While contemporary folk music is a genre generally distinct from traditional
folk music, in English it shares the same name, and it often shares the same
performers and venues as traditional folk music. Even individual songs may be a
blend of the two.
Cultural studies
In
the United Kingdom, sociologists and other scholars influenced by Marxism, such
as Stuart Hall and Raymond Williams, developed cultural studies. Following
nineteenth century Romantics, they identified culture with consumption goods
and leisure activities. Nevertheless, they understood patterns of consumption
and leisure to be determined by relations of production, which led them to
focus on class relations and the organization of production. In the United
States, Cultural Studies focuses largely on the study of popular culture, that is,
the social meanings of mass produced consumer and leisure goods. The term was
coined by Richard Hoggart in 1964 when he founded the Birmingham Centre for
contemporary cultural studies or CCCS. It has since become strongly associated
with Stuart Hall, who succeeded Hoggart as Director. Cultural studies in this
sense, then, can be viewed as a limited concentration scoped on the intricacies
of consumerism, which belongs to a wider culture sometimes referred to as Western
Civilization, or Globalism.
From
the 1970s onward, Stuart Hall pioneering work, along with his colleagues Paul
willis, Dick Hebbidge, Tony Jefferson, and Angela McRobbie, created an
international intellectual movement. As the field developed it began to combine
political economy, communication, sociology, social theory, literary theory,
media theory, film or video studies, cultural anthropology, philosophy, museum
studies and a at history to study cultural phenomena or cultural texts. In this
field researchers often concentrate on how particular phenomena relate to
matters of ideology, nationality, ethnicity, social class, and or gender. A
cultural study is concerned with the meaning and practices of everyday life.
These practices comprise the ways people do particular things in a given
culture. This field studies the meanings and uses people attribute to various
objects and practices. Specifically, culture involves those meanings and
practices held independently of reason. Watching television in order to view a
public perspective on a historical event should not be thought of as culture,
unless referring to the medium of television itself, which may have been
selected culturally, however, schoolchildren watching television after school with
their friends in order to fit in certainly qualifies, since there is no grounded
reason for one's participation in this practice. Recently, as capitalism has
spread throughout the world, cultural studies has begun to analyse local and
global forms of resistance to Western hegemony.
In the
context of cultural studies, the idea of a text not only includes written language, but also films, In the context of cultural studies, the idea of a text not only includes , but also, the texts of cultural studies comprise all the meaningful
artifacts of culture Similarly, the
discipline widens the concept of culture. Culture for a cultural studies
researcher not only includes traditional and, but also everyday meanings and practices. The last
two, in fact, have become the main focus of cultural studies. A further and
recent approach is, based on the discipline of and cultural studies
Scholars in the United Kingdom and
the developed somewhat different versions of cultural studies
after the field's inception in the late 1970s. The British version of cultural
studies was developed in the 1950s and 1960s mainly under the influence first
of Richard Hoggart and later Stuart Hall and others at the Centre for
Contemporary Cultural Studies. This included overtly political, views, and criticisms of as capitalist, it absorbed some of the
ideas of the critique of the. This emerges in the writings of early
British cultural studies scholars and their influences.
Whereas in the United States Lind of & Taylor said, Cultural
studies grounded in a pragmatic, liberal pluralist tradition. The American version of cultural studies initially
concerned itself more with understanding the subjective and appropriative side
of audience reactions to, and uses of, for example, American cultural studies
advocates wrote about the liberatory aspects of .The distinction between American and British strands,
however, has faded Some researchers,
especially in early British cultural studies, apply a model to the field. This strain of thinking has some
influence from the, but especially from the Marxism of and others. The main
focus of an orthodox Marxist approach concentrates on the production. This model assumes a mass production of culture and
identifies power as residing with those producing. In a Marxist view, those who control the essentially control a culture.
Other approaches to cultural studies, such as cultural studies and later American developments of the
field, distance themselves from this view. They criticize the Marxist
assumption of a single, dominant meaning, shared by all, for any cultural
product. The non Marxist approaches suggest that different ways of consuming
cultural artifacts affect the meaning of the product. This view is best
exemplified by the book Doing Cultural Studies, The Case of the Sony Walkman, which seeks to challenge the notion that those who produce
commodities control the meanings that people attribute to them. Feminist
cultural analyst, theorist and art historian contributed to cultural studies from viewpoints. The writer is among influential voices in the turn of the century,
contributing to cultural studies from the field of art and psychoanalytical.
Early
researchers and development of cultural sociology
The sociology of culture grew from the
intersection between sociology, as shaped by early theorists like Marx, Durkheim,
and Weber, and with the growing discipline of anthropology where researchers
pioneered ethnographic strategies for describing and analyzing a variety of
cultures around the world. Part of the legacy of the early development of the
field is still felt in the methods much of cultural sociological research is
qualitative in the theories a variety of critical approaches to sociology are
central to current research communities and substantive focus of the field. For
instance, relationships between popular culture, political control, and social class
were early and lasting concerns in the field.
Sociology
The sociology of culture concerns culture usually
understood as the ensemble of symbolic codes used by a society as it is
manifested in society. For Georg Simmel, culture referred to the
cultivation of individuals through the agency of external forms which have been
objectified in the course of history. Culture in the sociological field
can be defined as the ways of thinking, the ways of acting, and the material
objects that together shape a people way of life. Culture can be any of two
types, non material or material culture.
Cultural sociology first emerged in Weimar
Germany, where sociologists such as Alfred Weber used the term Kultursoziologie. Cultural sociology
was then reinvented in the English speaking world as a product of the of the
1960s, which ushered in strcturalist and postmodern approaches to social
science. This type of cultural sociology may loosely be regarded as an approach
incorporating cultural analysis and critical theory. Cultural sociologists tend
to reject scientific methods, instead hermeneutically focusing on words,
artifacts and symbols. Culture has since become an important concept across
many branches of sociology, including resolutely scientific fields like social
stratification and social network analysis. As a result, there has been a
recent influx of quantitative sociologists to the field. Thus there is now a
growing group of sociologists of culture who are, confusingly, not cultural
sociologists. These scholars reject the abstracted postmodern aspects of
cultural sociology, and instead look for a theoretical backing in the more
scientific vein of social psychology and cognitive science. Cultural sociology
is one of the largest sections of the American Sociological Association. The
British establishment of cultural studies means the latter is often taught as a
loosely distinct discipline in the UK.
Integrated
pattern of human knowledge, belief, and behaviour that is both a result of an
integral to the human capacity for learning and transmitting knowledge to
succeeding generations. Culture thus consists of language, ideas, beliefs,
customs, taboos, codes, institutions, tools, techniques, and works of art,
rituals, ceremonies, and symbols. It has played a crucial role in human
evolution, allowing
human beings to adapt the environment to their own purposes rather than depend
solely on natural selection to
achieve adaptive success. Every human society has its own particular culture,
or sociocultural system. Variation among cultures is attributable to such
factors as differing physical habitats and resources, the range of
possibilities inherent in areas such as language, ritual, and social
organization, and historical phenomena such as the development of links with
other cultures. An individual attitudes, values, ideals, and beliefs are
greatly influenced by the culture in which he or she lives. Culture change
takes place as a result of ecological, socioeconomic, political, religious, or
other fundamental factors affecting a society. See also culture contact,
sociocultural evolution.
Culture Definition
Some definitions
Culture
refers to the cumulative deposit of knowledge, experience, beliefs, values,
attitudes, meanings, hierarchies, religion, notions of time, roles, spatial
relations, concepts of the universe, and material objects and possessions
acquired by a group of people in the course of generations through individual
and group striving.
Culture
is the systems of knowledge shared by a relatively large group of people.
Culture
is communication, communication is culture.
Culture
in its broadest sense is cultivated behavior; that is the totality of a
person's learned, accumulated experience which is socially transmitted, or more
briefly, behavior through social learning.
A
culture is a way of life of a group of people--the behaviors, beliefs, values,
and symbols that they accept, generally without thinking about them, and that
are passed along by communication and imitation from one generation to the
next.
Culture
is symbolic communication. Some of its symbols include a group skills,
knowledge, attitudes, values, and motives. The meanings of the symbols are
learned and deliberately perpetuated in a society through its institutions.
Culture
consists of patterns, explicit and implicit, of and for behavior acquired and
transmitted by symbols, constituting the distinctive achievement of human
groups, including their embodiments in artifacts; the essential core of culture
consists of traditional ideas and especially their attached values; culture
systems may, on the one hand, be considered as products of action, on the other
hand, as conditioning influences upon further action.
Culture
is the sum of total of the learned behavior of a group of people that are
generally considered to be the tradition of that people and are transmitted
from generation to generation.
Culture
is a collective programming of the mind that distinguishes the members of one
group or category of people from another.
Theory of cultural determinism
The position that the ideas, meanings, beliefs
and values people learn as members of society determines human nature. People
are what they learn. Optimistic version of cultural determinism places no
limits on the abilities of human beings to do or to be whatever they want. Some
anthropologists suggest that there is no universal right way of being human. Right
way is almost always our way, that our way in one society almost never
corresponds to our way in any other society. Proper attitude of an informed
human being could only be that of tolerance.
The optimistic version of this theory postulates
that human nature being infinitely malleable, human being can choose the ways
of life they prefer.
The pessimistic version maintains that people
are what they are conditioned to be, this is something over which they have no
control. Human beings are passive creatures and do whatever their culture tells
them to do. This explanation leads to behaviourism that locates the causes of
human behavior in a realm that is totally beyond human control.
Cultural relativism
Different cultural groups think, feel, and act differently. There are no
scientific standards for considering one group as intrinsically superior or
inferior to another. Studying differences in culture among groups and societies
presupposes a position of cultural relativism. It does not imply normalcy for
oneself, or for one society. It, however, calls for judgment when dealing with
groups or societies different from one's own. Information about the nature of
cultural differences between societies, their roots, and their consequences
should precede judgment and action. Negotiation is more likely to succeed when
the parties concerned understand the reasons for the differences in viewpoints.
Cultural
ethnocentrism
Ethnocentrism is the belief that one own culture is superior to that of
other cultures. It is a form of reductionism that reduces the other way of life
to a distorted version of one own. This is particularly important in case of
global dealings when a company or an individual is imbued with the idea that
methods, materials, or ideas that worked in the home country will also work
abroad. Environmental differences are, therefore, ignored. Ethnocentrism, in
relation to global dealings, can be categorized as follows:
Important factors in business are overlooked because of the obsession
with certain cause-effect relationships in one's own country. It is always a
good idea to refer to checklists of human variables in order to be assured that
all major factors have been at least considered while working abroad.
Even though one may recognize the environmental differences and problems
associated with change, but may focus only on achieving objectives related to
the home country. This may result in the loss of effectiveness of a company or
an individual in terms of international competitiveness. The objectives set for
global operations should also be global.
The differences are recognized, but it is assumed that associated
changes are so basic that they can be achieved effortlessly. It is always a
good idea to perform a cost benefit analysis of the changes proposed.
Sometimes a change may upset important values and thereby may face resistance
from being implemented. The cost of some changes may exceed the benefits
derived from the implementation of such changes.
Manifestations of culture
Cultural differences manifest themselves in different ways and differing
levels of depth. Symbols represent the most superficial and value the deepest
manifestations of culture, with heroes and rituals in between.
Symbols are words, gestures, pictures, or objects that carry a
particular meaning which is only recognized by those who share a particular
culture. New symbols easily develop, old ones disappear. Symbols from one
particular group are regularly copied by others. This is why symbols represent
the outermost layer of a culture.
Heroes are persons, past or present, real or fictitious, who possess
characteristics that are highly prized in a culture. They also serve as models
for behavior.
Rituals are collective activities, sometimes superfluous in reaching
desired objectives, but are considered as socially essential. They are
therefore carried out most of the times for their own sake.
The core of a culture is formed by values. They are broad tendencies for
preferences of certain state of affairs to others. Many values remain
unconscious to those who hold them. Therefore they often cannot be discussed,
nor can they be directly observed by others. Values can only be inferred from
the way people act under different circumstances.
Symbols, heroes, and rituals are the tangible or visual aspects of the
practices of a culture. The true cultural meaning of the practices is
intangible; this is revealed only when the practices are interpreted by the
insiders.
Layers of culture
People even within the same culture carry
several layers of mental programming within themselves. Different layers of
culture exist at the following levels.
The
national level: Associated with the nation as a whole.
The
regional level: Associated with ethnic, linguistic, or religious differences that exist
within a nation.
The
gender level: Associated with gender differences.
The
generation level: Associated with the differences between grandparents and parents,
parents and children.
The
social class level: Associated with educational opportunities and differences in
occupation.
The
corporate level: Associated with the particular culture of an organization. Applicable
to those who are employed.
Measuring cultural differences
A variable can be operationalzed either by single or composite measure
techniques. A single measure technique means the use of one indicator to
measure the domain of a concept, the composite measure technique means the use
of several indicators to construct an index for the concept after the domain of
the concept has been empirically sampled. Hofstede has devised a composite measure
technique to measure cultural differences among different societies,
Power
distance index: The index measures the degree of inequality that exists in a
society.
Uncertainty
avoidance index: The index measures the extent to which a society feels threatened by
uncertain or ambiguous situations.
Individualism
index: The index measure the extent to which a society is individualistic.
Individualism refers to a loosely knit social framework in a society in which
people are supposed to take care of themselves and their immediate families
only. The other end of the spectrum would be collectivism that occurs when
there is a tight social framework in which people distinguish between in groups
and out groups, they expect their in groups to look after them in exchange for
absolute loyalty.
Masculinity
index: The index measures the extent to which the dominant values are assertiveness,
money and things, not caring for others or for quality of life. The other end
of the spectrum would be femininity.
Reconciliation of cultural differences
Cultural awareness
Before venturing on a global assignment, it is
probably necessary to identify the cultural differences that may exist between
one's home country and the country of business operation. Where the differences
exist, one must decide whether and to what extent the practices may be adapted
to the foreign environment. Most of the times the differences are not very
apparent or tangible. Certain aspects of a culture may be learned consciously e.g.
methods of greeting people, some other differences are learned subconsciously e.g.
methods of problem solving. The building of cultural awareness may not be an
easy task, but once accomplished, it definitely helps a job done efficiently in
a foreign environment.
Discussions and reading about other cultures
definitely helps build cultural awareness, but opinions presented must be
carefully measured. Sometimes they may represent unwarranted stereotypes, an
assessment of only a subgroup of a particular group of people, or a situation
that has since undergone drastic changes. It is always a good idea to get
varied viewpoints about the same culture.
Clustering cultures
Some countries may share many attributes that help mold their cultures the
modifiers may be language, religion, geographical location, etc. Based on this
data obtained from past cross cultural studies, countries may be grouped by
similarities in values and attitudes. Fewer differences may be expected when
moving within a cluster than when moving from one cluster to another.
Determining the extent of global involvement
All enterprises operating globally need not have
the same degree of cultural awareness. Figure 2 illustrates extent to which a
company needs to understand global cultures at different levels of involvement.
The further a company moves out from the sole role of doing domestic business,
the more it needs to understand cultural differences. Moving outward on more
than one axis simultaneously makes the need for building cultural awareness
even more essential.
What is
culture Definition of culture
Culture is the characteristics of a particular group of
people, defined by everything from language, religion, cuisine, social habits,
music and arts. Today, in the United States as in other countries populated
largely by immigrants, the culture is influenced by the many groups of people
that now make up the country.
Western culture
The term Western culture has come to define the culture of
European countries as well as those such as the united
states that have been heavily influenced by European
immigration. Western culture has its roots in the Classical Period of the Greco
Roman era and the rise of Christianity in the 14th century. Other drivers of the Western culture include Latin, Celtic, Germanic and
Hellenic ethnic and linguistic groups. Today, the influences of Western culture
can be seen in almost every country in the world.
Eastern culture
Eastern culture generally refers to the societal norms
of countries in Far East Asia China,
Japan, Vietnam, North Korea and South Korea and the Indian subcontinent. Like
the West, Eastern culture was heavily influenced by religion during its early
development. In general, in Eastern culture there is less of a distinction
between secular society and religious philosophy than there is in the West.
Latin culture
Many of the Spanish-speaking nations are considered
part of the Latin culture, while the geographic region is widespread. Latin
America is typically defined as those parts of the Central America, South
America and Mexico where Spanish or Portuguese are the dominant languages.
While Spain and Portugal are on the European continent, they are considered the
key influencers of what is known as Latin culture, which denotes people using
languages derived from Latin, also known as Romance languages.
Middle Eastern culture
The countries of the Middle East have some but
not all things in common, including a strong belief in Islam and religion is a
very strong pillar of this society. The Arabic language is also common
throughout the region, however, the wide variety of dialect can sometimes make
communication difficult.
African culture
The continent of Africa is essential two cultures
North Africa and Sub Saharan Africa. The continent is comprised of a number of
tribes, ethnic and social groups. One of the key features of this culture is
the large number of ethnic groups some countries can have 20 or more and the
diversity of their beliefs
Northwest Africa in particular has strong ties
to European and South western Asia. The area also has a heavy Islamic influence
and is a major player in the Arab world.
The harsh environment has been a large factor in
the development of Sub Saharan Africa culture, as there are a number of
languages, cuisines, art and musical styles that have sprung up among the far flung
populations.
What are the characteristics of culture
The 6 characteristics of
culture start with the fact that culture is learned and shared. Culture is
transgenerational. It is adaptive without losing the original roots. Culture is
cumulative. It is transmitted either orally or through writing.
Outline of culture
Culture set of patterns of human activity within a society or social group and the
symbolic structures that give such activity significance. Customs, laws, dress,
architectural style, social standards, religious beliefs, and traditions are
all examples of cultural elements.
Cultural
Types
Several authors have proposed ways to classify cultures,
highlighting the contrasts between them. A general awareness of these may help
you in communicating with people from different cultures. In cultures such as in Arabic countries, Mexico or India, power
distance is high. In these cultures, subordinates tend to respect and accept
their boss merely because of his position. Relevance to Medicine, This tends to lead to unquestioning acceptance of a doctor
orders. Patients from societies with lower power distance may not automatically
respect a doctor opinion and may tend to question your reason for saying what
you do. Countries such as
Japan, France or Greece tend to avoid uncertainty, they prefer predictability
and so develop strict hierarchies, laws and procedures. Deviant ideas are
discouraged and consensus is important, so there is typically a strong sense of
nationalism. In Nordic and Anglophone countries, people seem to tolerate
uncertainty more, they dislike structure, thereis less nationalism. Relevance to
Medicine, People from cultures
that avoid uncertainty may wish their doctor to provide clear guidance on what
they must do. People from cultures that tolerate uncertainty may accept that
there are always alternative approaches; a therapy may be tried and if it
works, great, but if it does not, another one may. In
individualistic countries, people are responsible for themselves and initiative
is valued; people have relatively weak ties to their organization. In
collectivist countries such as China or Japan, a person’s identity is based on
their group membership, so they value tight social frameworks and a feeling of
belonging to an organization.
Relevance to Medicine People from individualistic cultures may expect to make their own decisions regarding their health. Countries such as Mexico, Germany or Japan espouse traditionally masculine values such as assertiveness, materialism and lack of concern for others. People work long hours and their job is of central importance. Gender roles are clearly distinguished often the husband will make decisions for the wife. By contrast, low masculinity cultures Sweden, Denmark value quality of life, concern for others. However, universal trends such as dual career families are eroding the gap between high and low masculinity cultures. Relevance to Medicine Masculine values tend to coincide with a clear distinction between gender roles, often the husband will make decisions for the wife. It is common for people from collectivist cultures to take therapeutic decisions as a member of a group, social pressures may strongly influence the individual, who may fear a sense of humiliation if he does not comply. Collectivist societies value harmony whereas individualistic societies value self respect and autonomy. Western societies typically have a short term focus and view time as a valuable resource. There is an emphasis on focusing on one thing at a time. For other societies time urgency is much less important. They may be polychronic lots of things can happen at once and things can be put off to later. Expect patients from such cultures to be late Eight clock Jamaica time means any time after around nine or nine thirty. In some Arabic cultures, deadlines may even be viewed as an insult: important things take a long time and cannot be rushed.
Personal Cultural
In personal cultures, obligation is defined universally;
obligations are imposed consistently, without regard for individual
circumstances
In personal societies, communication is subtle and restrained, so
may be hard to read for someone brought up in a social culture
In personal cultures, relationships tend to be direct, open and,
if needed, confrontational USA. Work and personal life are separated
In personal societies, respect is based on the person competence
and achievements. Women can gain access to senior positions, and newcomers are
respected if they prove themselves.
Societal Cultures
In a societal culture, obligations are particular and based on
relationships, personal trust is high and so is duty to family
Societal cultures are effective, physical contact is accepted and
people express their feelings openly, body language is strong
In society based cultures, relationships are diffuse and indirect,
private and work life may be linked the family business, China and direct
confrontation is avoided
In a society based culture, status is ascribed based on age,
gender, family origins, social position, etc.
No comments:
Post a Comment